Fluency & Coherence

The candidate willingly speaks at length and displays little effort. There are instances of hesitation, usually mid-sentence, which indicates some difficulty in accessing appropriate language. There is also an occasional lack of coherence, particularly in Part 2 of the Speaking test, which sounds unnatural and may indicate reliance on set phrases and memorised chunks of language. The candidate is most effective in Part 3 of the Speaking test.

One example of lack of coherence is:

• “I can get information in the Internet, such as, I can chat with my friends.”

Lexical Resource

The candidate shows a wide enough range of vocabulary to discuss topics at length. There are some cases of lexical inappropriacy, though the meaning is generally clear. Although there is some evidence of idiomatic items, they are often incorrectly applied. For instance:

• “… can make a family to clear the air and ease this misunderstanding.”

• “… such as floating in a seam of light …”

• “They can undergo this two issues at the same time.”

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

She produces varied structures with reasonable accuracy, including a mix of simple and complex structures. However, there are frequent errors (e.g., agreement, verb forms) though these are generally not problematic to the listener. For example:

• “In China, the government has take a lot of issues …”

• “On the one hand, they can protect this places …”

• “I can also get some other knowledges.”

• “Their relationship was happen in the campus of Cambridge University.”

• “Such as you can search on the Internet that which place I want to go … and then you go there and you can get your point and to check on the places step by step.”

• “You have known that and then you can see that.”

The past or future tense could be used more effectively when relating what did and what will happen.

Pronunciation

The candidate demonstrates various phonological features (e.g., weak forms, word and sound linking, elision, contracted forms) and chunking is generally appropriate. However, mispronunciations are evident (such as “a lot” in Part 1) and intonation and stress is often randomly applied.

Overall score: 6.5

流利性和一致性

候选人愿意长篇大论，但几乎没有表现出任何努力。有一些犹豫的情况，通常是在句子中间，这表明在使用适当的语言方面有一些困难。偶尔也有缺乏连贯性的情况，特别是在口语测试的第二部分，听起来不自然，可能表明考生依赖固定的短语和记忆的语言块。考生在口语测试的第三部分中效果最佳。

缺乏连贯性的一个例子是：

- 我可以在互联网上获取信息，比如，我可以和朋友聊天。

词汇资源

考生表现出足够广泛的词汇量，可以长时间讨论话题。有一些词汇不恰当的情况，虽然意思基本明确。虽然有一些证据表明有成语项，但往往应用不正确。例如：:

- ... 可以让一家子人澄清事实，缓解这种误解。

- ......如浮在光缝中......

- 他们可以同时接受这两个问题。

语法范围与准确性

她的发音结构多样，准确度较高，包括简单和复杂结构的混合。然而，经常会出现一些错误（例如，协议、动词形式），尽管这些错误一般不会给听众带来问题。例如：

- 在中国，政府已经采取了很多问题...

- 一方面，他们可以保护这个地方......

- 我也可以得到一些其他的知识。

- 他们的关系是发生在剑桥大学的校园里。

- 比如你可以在网上搜索我想去的地方... ...然后你就可以去那里，你可以得到你的观点，并一步一步地检查这些地方。

- 你已经知道了，然后你就可以看到了。

在联系做了什么和将要发生什么时，可以更有效地使用过去式或将来式。

发音

考生表现出各种语音特征（如弱形式、词与音的连接、洗脱、收缩形式），分块基本合适。但错音明显（如第一部分中的 很多），语调和重音往往随意运用。

总分：6.5分